Blog
SEC Announces FY 2027 Examination Priorities: What Investment Advisers and Fund Managers Should Know
Scott Brown | 29 October 2026
The SEC's latest examination priorities reinforce longstanding compliance expectations while signaling increased attention to private markets, emerging technologies, and operational resilience. Here's what firms should consider as they prepare for the year ahead.
On October 23, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released its fiscal year 2027 examination priorities, outlining the areas its Division of Examinations will emphasize in the coming year.
The priorities reflect an evolving regulatory environment in which traditional compliance obligations intersect with increasingly complex investment products, new technologies, and changing market structures.
For investment advisers and fund managers, the message is clear: While the SEC continues to adapt its examination program to emerging risks, the fundamentals of effective compliance remain central to its oversight.
Below, we examine several areas of relevance to asset managers and the practical implications for firms preparing for an SEC examination.
The SEC continues to prioritize investment advisers' adherence to fiduciary obligations, including the management of conflicts of interest, investment recommendations, and the effectiveness of compliance programs.
These are familiar examination themes, but their continued prominence is significant. As firms expand their investment strategies, introduce new products, or pursue additional distribution channels, the potential for conflicts and compliance gaps can increase.
What this means for firms:
Advisers should evaluate whether their compliance programs continue to reflect how their businesses actually operate. Policies developed for a simpler business model may no longer adequately address the risks associated with new strategies, investor populations, or operational arrangements.
Particular attention should be given to:
The important distinction is between an adviser having documented policies and the ability to evidence that those policies are effectively implemented. Firms should be prepared to explain not only what their procedures require, but provide documentation showing how they monitor compliance and address identified deficiencies.
Among the more notable elements of the FY 2027 priorities is the SEC's explicit focus on private funds, private credit, and complex investment strategies.
This attention comes as private market investments continue to evolve and reach a broader range of investors. The SEC has also identified retail investor protection, particularly involving complex, higher-risk, and illiquid products, as an examination priority.
Together, these areas suggest that regulators are paying close attention to the risks that can arise when complex investment structures intersect with investor liquidity needs, valuation uncertainty, and potentially difficult-to-understand fees.
What this means for firms:
Private fund advisers should consider reviewing the operational and compliance processes supporting their investment strategies, particularly in areas such as:
For managers expanding into private credit or developing products for a broader investor base, these considerations become especially important.
The SEC's priorities do not establish new requirements for private fund managers. They do, however, provide a strong reason to revisit whether existing controls are appropriate for the complexity of the products being offered.
The SEC's FY 2027 priorities also highlight emerging technologies, including advanced artificial intelligence, and their potential effects on market operations, compliance, fraud prevention, and investor protection.
Technology has become increasingly embedded in investment management, from portfolio analytics and trading systems to compliance monitoring and operational workflows.
While these tools can improve efficiency and strengthen oversight, they can also introduce risks involving data integrity, system reliability, vendor dependencies, and insufficient human review.
What this means for firms:
Investment advisers and fund managers should understand where and how emerging technologies are being used within their organizations.
A practical review may include:
The broader implication is that technology adoption should be accompanied by appropriate governance.
Firms do not necessarily need entirely new compliance frameworks for every emerging technology. They do need to determine whether existing controls are properly documented and that they adequately address the risks those technologies introduce.
Cybersecurity, customer information protection, and operational resilience continue to feature prominently in the SEC's examination agenda.
For asset managers, these responsibilities extend beyond information technology departments. They involve the processes, personnel, systems, and external service providers that support day-to-day operations.
As firms rely on increasingly interconnected technology platforms and outsourced service providers, operational resilience depends on understanding where vulnerabilities exist and how disruptions would be managed.
What this means for firms:
Advisers and fund managers should assess whether their cybersecurity and business continuity practices reflect their current operating environments.
Areas to evaluate include incident response procedures, protection of sensitive information, access management, vendor oversight, and the ability to maintain critical functions during a disruption.
Firms should also review their adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, including Regulation S-P, and confirm that relevant personnel understand their responsibilities.
Operational resilience is not simply a matter of maintaining written plans. Firms should consider whether those plans have been tested, whether weaknesses have been addressed, and whether responsibilities are clearly assigned.
The SEC also identified risks associated with changes in market infrastructure, including Treasury clearing reforms and tokenization.
Although these developments may not directly affect every investment adviser or fund manager, they demonstrate how changes in market structure can create new operational and compliance considerations.
Tokenized securities, for example, may introduce questions involving custody arrangements, transaction processing, recordkeeping, and the responsibilities of various service providers.
Similarly, changes to clearing requirements can affect trading workflows, counterparties, and operational infrastructure.
What this means for firms:
Managers considering new investment structures or participating in evolving markets should evaluate the operational implications before implementation.
That includes determining whether existing policies, systems, personnel, and service-provider relationships can adequately support the proposed activities.
The SEC's inclusion of these topics reinforces the importance of incorporating compliance and operational considerations into product development and strategic planning, rather than addressing them after launch.
Although the FY 2027 examination priorities identify areas of heightened attention, they are not an exhaustive list of what SEC examiners may review. The Division continues to use a risk-based approach, and individual examinations will reflect a firm's particular activities and circumstances.
Rather than treating the priorities as a checklist of isolated regulatory topics, firms should use them as an opportunity to assess the effectiveness of their broader compliance and operational infrastructure.
Several practical steps can help inform that process:
The SEC's FY 2027 priorities reflect both continuity and change.
Fiduciary responsibilities, conflicts of interest, and effective compliance programs remain central examination concerns. At the same time, the growing emphasis on private markets, advanced technologies, and evolving market infrastructure reflects the increasing complexity of the asset management industry.
For investment advisers and fund managers, examination readiness should be an ongoing process rather than a response to an examination notice.
The firms best positioned to navigate regulatory scrutiny will be those that understand their risks, maintain effective controls, and can demonstrate that their compliance and operational practices reflect the realities of their businesses.
PINE Advisor Solutions works with investment advisers and fund managers to address complex regulatory compliance and operational responsibilities. Through outsourced CCO services, regulatory compliance consulting, financial oversight, and operational expertise, PINE helps firms evaluate their practices, strengthen controls, and prepare for regulatory examinations.
Contact PINE to discuss your firm's compliance and examination readiness needs.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
On October 23, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released its fiscal year 2027 examination priorities, outlining the areas its Division of Examinations will emphasize in the coming year.
The priorities reflect an evolving regulatory environment in which traditional compliance obligations intersect with increasingly complex investment products, new technologies, and changing market structures.
For investment advisers and fund managers, the message is clear: While the SEC continues to adapt its examination program to emerging risks, the fundamentals of effective compliance remain central to its oversight.
Below, we examine several areas of relevance to asset managers and the practical implications for firms preparing for an SEC examination.
1. Fiduciary obligations and conflicts of interest remain foundational
The SEC continues to prioritize investment advisers' adherence to fiduciary obligations, including the management of conflicts of interest, investment recommendations, and the effectiveness of compliance programs.
These are familiar examination themes, but their continued prominence is significant. As firms expand their investment strategies, introduce new products, or pursue additional distribution channels, the potential for conflicts and compliance gaps can increase.
What this means for firms:
Advisers should evaluate whether their compliance programs continue to reflect how their businesses actually operate. Policies developed for a simpler business model may no longer adequately address the risks associated with new strategies, investor populations, or operational arrangements.
Particular attention should be given to:
- Identifying, disclosing, and appropriately addressing conflicts of interest
- Ensuring disclosures accurately reflect business practices and compensation arrangements
- Reviewing investment recommendation and allocation processes
- Evaluating whether compliance testing and oversight are appropriately tailored to the firm's activities
The important distinction is between an adviser having documented policies and the ability to evidence that those policies are effectively implemented. Firms should be prepared to explain not only what their procedures require, but provide documentation showing how they monitor compliance and address identified deficiencies.
2. Private funds and private credit face continued scrutiny
Among the more notable elements of the FY 2027 priorities is the SEC's explicit focus on private funds, private credit, and complex investment strategies.
This attention comes as private market investments continue to evolve and reach a broader range of investors. The SEC has also identified retail investor protection, particularly involving complex, higher-risk, and illiquid products, as an examination priority.
Together, these areas suggest that regulators are paying close attention to the risks that can arise when complex investment structures intersect with investor liquidity needs, valuation uncertainty, and potentially difficult-to-understand fees.
What this means for firms:
Private fund advisers should consider reviewing the operational and compliance processes supporting their investment strategies, particularly in areas such as:
- Valuation: Whether valuation methodologies are consistently applied, documented, and supported by appropriate oversight
- Fees and expenses: Whether calculations, allocations, and disclosures align with governing documents and actual practices
- Liquidity: Whether redemption terms, liquidity management practices, and investor communications accurately reflect the underlying investments
- Conflicts of interest: Whether arrangements involving affiliated parties, allocation decisions, and other potential conflicts are appropriately identified, disclosed, and addressed
For managers expanding into private credit or developing products for a broader investor base, these considerations become especially important.
The SEC's priorities do not establish new requirements for private fund managers. They do, however, provide a strong reason to revisit whether existing controls are appropriate for the complexity of the products being offered.
3. Emerging technologies introduce new examination considerations
The SEC's FY 2027 priorities also highlight emerging technologies, including advanced artificial intelligence, and their potential effects on market operations, compliance, fraud prevention, and investor protection.
Technology has become increasingly embedded in investment management, from portfolio analytics and trading systems to compliance monitoring and operational workflows.
While these tools can improve efficiency and strengthen oversight, they can also introduce risks involving data integrity, system reliability, vendor dependencies, and insufficient human review.
What this means for firms:
Investment advisers and fund managers should understand where and how emerging technologies are being used within their organizations.
A practical review may include:
- Identifying AI-enabled tools used in investment, compliance, and operational functions
- Establishing appropriate oversight of automated processes and outputs
- Reviewing vendor due diligence and third-party technology arrangements
- Evaluating data security, access controls, and information governance
- Ensuring representations about technology capabilities are accurate and supportable
The broader implication is that technology adoption should be accompanied by appropriate governance.
Firms do not necessarily need entirely new compliance frameworks for every emerging technology. They do need to determine whether existing controls are properly documented and that they adequately address the risks those technologies introduce.
4. Cybersecurity and operational resilience remain critical
Cybersecurity, customer information protection, and operational resilience continue to feature prominently in the SEC's examination agenda.
For asset managers, these responsibilities extend beyond information technology departments. They involve the processes, personnel, systems, and external service providers that support day-to-day operations.
As firms rely on increasingly interconnected technology platforms and outsourced service providers, operational resilience depends on understanding where vulnerabilities exist and how disruptions would be managed.
What this means for firms:
Advisers and fund managers should assess whether their cybersecurity and business continuity practices reflect their current operating environments.
Areas to evaluate include incident response procedures, protection of sensitive information, access management, vendor oversight, and the ability to maintain critical functions during a disruption.
Firms should also review their adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, including Regulation S-P, and confirm that relevant personnel understand their responsibilities.
Operational resilience is not simply a matter of maintaining written plans. Firms should consider whether those plans have been tested, whether weaknesses have been addressed, and whether responsibilities are clearly assigned.
5. Evolving market structures require adaptable oversight
The SEC also identified risks associated with changes in market infrastructure, including Treasury clearing reforms and tokenization.
Although these developments may not directly affect every investment adviser or fund manager, they demonstrate how changes in market structure can create new operational and compliance considerations.
Tokenized securities, for example, may introduce questions involving custody arrangements, transaction processing, recordkeeping, and the responsibilities of various service providers.
Similarly, changes to clearing requirements can affect trading workflows, counterparties, and operational infrastructure.
What this means for firms:
Managers considering new investment structures or participating in evolving markets should evaluate the operational implications before implementation.
That includes determining whether existing policies, systems, personnel, and service-provider relationships can adequately support the proposed activities.
The SEC's inclusion of these topics reinforces the importance of incorporating compliance and operational considerations into product development and strategic planning, rather than addressing them after launch.
What should investment advisers and fund managers do now?
Although the FY 2027 examination priorities identify areas of heightened attention, they are not an exhaustive list of what SEC examiners may review. The Division continues to use a risk-based approach, and individual examinations will reflect a firm's particular activities and circumstances.
Rather than treating the priorities as a checklist of isolated regulatory topics, firms should use them as an opportunity to assess the effectiveness of their broader compliance and operational infrastructure.
Several practical steps can help inform that process:
- Reassess the firm's risk profile. Consider whether new products, investment strategies, technologies, or business relationships have introduced risks not adequately addressed by existing policies.
- Evaluate implementation, not just documentation. Confirm that compliance procedures are being followed, monitoring is performed, and identified issues are documented and remediated.
- Review coordination across functions. Compliance, finance, fund operations, investment teams, and external service providers should have clearly defined responsibilities and effective communication processes.
- Test examination readiness. Evaluate the firm's ability to retrieve relevant records, explain its processes, substantiate disclosures, and demonstrate oversight.
- Address gaps proactively. Findings from internal reviews, testing, and prior examinations should inform documented corrective actions and ongoing improvements.
- Document compliance oversight. A successful compliance program is based on what you can prove you've done, not just what you say you do. Advisers should maintain logs, testing files, memos, meeting minutes, or other evidence to support their compliance oversight.
Looking ahead
The SEC's FY 2027 priorities reflect both continuity and change.
Fiduciary responsibilities, conflicts of interest, and effective compliance programs remain central examination concerns. At the same time, the growing emphasis on private markets, advanced technologies, and evolving market infrastructure reflects the increasing complexity of the asset management industry.
For investment advisers and fund managers, examination readiness should be an ongoing process rather than a response to an examination notice.
The firms best positioned to navigate regulatory scrutiny will be those that understand their risks, maintain effective controls, and can demonstrate that their compliance and operational practices reflect the realities of their businesses.
How PINE can help
PINE Advisor Solutions works with investment advisers and fund managers to address complex regulatory compliance and operational responsibilities. Through outsourced CCO services, regulatory compliance consulting, financial oversight, and operational expertise, PINE helps firms evaluate their practices, strengthen controls, and prepare for regulatory examinations.
Contact PINE to discuss your firm's compliance and examination readiness needs.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.